Debunking 4 Common Tech Recycling Myths
Electronic devices have become synonymous with modern living, working, and convenience. It’s easy to begrudge the advancements in devices and tech, from smartphones, TVs and laptops to smart appliances, artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT), but it would be naive to ignore their presence in everyday life.
The accelerating pace of tech advancement has created an evergreen dichotomy, however. As more devices become firmly intertwined into our lives and habits for convenience, the electronic waste (colloquially dubbed ‘e-waste’) problem compounds exponentially.
Let’s not beat around the bush: e-waste is a serious problem and has been for some time. While there has been growing awareness about the need for proper disposal and recycling of electronic devices and equipment, the Internet is, sadly, rife with misinformation.
Numerous misconceptions, inaccuracies and misleading statistics persist online that many are taking as gospel and espousing why they are neglecting proper e-waste recycling hygiene.
To combat this and prevent the perpetuation of a misinformed discourse about e-waste, let’s examine and debunk four of the most prominent myths about e-waste recycling and tell you what’s really occurring.
Myth 1: “E-waste is not a big issue.”
As far as global environmental issues are concerned, many view e-waste as an insignificant one compared to carbon emissions, plastic pollution, or rising global temperatures. However, e-waste is one of the fastest-growing waste streams globally. The UN recently reported that 62 billion kilograms of e-waste is generated internationally (averaging 7.8kg per capita), and it’s predicted that 82 billion kilograms will be generated in 2030 if current trends continue.
What makes this most alarming is the composition of electronicsnd their byproducts, which are environmentally hazardous. Materials like lead, cadmium, mercury and brominated flame retardants can leach into soil and groundwater when they’re improperly disposed of. These toxins are severely damaging biodiversity and ecosystem health.
However, we’ve seen promising signs of progress. According to MPB’s FY24 impact sustainability report, their initiatives alone facilitated the recycling of approximately 570,000 individual items of photo and video gear in 2024. This highlights that the same efforts can be extended to other electronics like smartphones, games, tablets, computers and more, with retailers like musicMagpie leading by example.
Myth 2: “Most electronics end up in landfills anyway.”
A common misconception some consumers have is that even when recycling their old electronics, their final destination is a landfill site.
While poorly managed collection programs do exist, legitimate e-waste recycling programs are bound by strict environmental standards and regulations, such as the WEEE (Waste from Electrical and Electronic Equipment) Directive in the EU.
In the U.S., many states have enacted laws to regulate statewide e-waste recycling, with many using the ‘producer responsibility’ approach (i.e. manufacturers essentially fund and manage recycling programs for their products). On top of this, federal regulations exist like the RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act), under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which controls hazardous waste disposal of electronics containing toxic materials.
Therefore, to suggest electronics are cast aside and illegally disposed of regardless of their composition is hyperbole at best.
Myth 3: “E-waste recycling isn’t financially viable.”
The idea that recycling electronics is economically unsustainable is still held by many despite there being an abundance of evidence to the contrary.
E-waste contains a higher concentration of precious metals than natural ore deposits. For example, a metric ton of circuit boards can contain 40-800 times as much gold as that which is found in gold ore.
Urban mining of e-waste is generally recognized as the most economically viable and sustainable alternative to traditional mining. Recovering metals from discarded electronics consumes less energy than extracting virgin materials, not to mention the fact that it reduces the environmental damage associated with mining itself. What’s more, the e-waste industry creates more jobs than landfilling or incineration, so there is evidently an economic incentive there.
Myth 4: “One person’s recycling efforts don’t make a difference.”
It’s easy to assume that individual actions don’t amount to much in the collective fight to preserve finite resources and prevent temperatures from soaring to irrecoverable heights. However, every properly recycled device keeps harmful substances away from landfills and allows valuable materials to be properly recovered, repurposed, and reused.
Beyond the fractional environmental benefits of a personal choice, conscientious environmental stewardship is a learned behavior. Consumers influence others and lead by example, which cumulatively creates a demand for more sustainable products and services, such as:
> Electronics with a longer lifespan
> Devices which can be repaired more easily
> Products made from 100% recycled materials
Looking Ahead and Moving Forward
The shift towards circular technology habits is apparent. When consumers choose more sustainable products, manufacturers take notice and respond with equally eco-conscious design principles.
Circular economy regulations like the EU Circular Economy Act, the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) are redefining business models this year and beyond. This suggests that circularity and sustainability are firmly on the agenda for policymakers and businesses alike, which means that proper e-waste recycling holds value.
As consumers, we must recognize and understand responsible tech use, hygiene and disposal if we’re to build conscious habits for future generations.